|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 14, 2007 20:54:26 GMT -5
Why is it that when you kill a known murderer who was never caught, you go to jail. This is why I hate Americas laws. If someone murders like 20 people he shouldn't serve a life sentence. In a life sentence he might have chances to kill other people who went to jail by accident. They should be executed. Government thinks its inhumane? Fuck the fucking government! The death penalty is completely human. They think that injecting a murderer who has killed 1000's of people is inhumane. I think we shouldn't inject them, that is inhumane. We should cut off one of his fingers and toes everyday, until he dies from blood lust and if hes still not dead start hacking off body parts! I don't see why anyone should disagree with this. When I say death penalty i mean proven critical evidence though. Some rockstar went to jail for 25 years for torturing a guy who tried to kill his family. The rockstar got more years then the attempted murderer! We need the death penalty!
|
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 16, 2007 1:33:38 GMT -5
1. Its "blood loss" not "blood lust" idiot -.-
2. Move to Texas, they enforce the death penalty AND they put in an express lane (if 3 people saw you do it you move to the top of the list, i think)
|
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 16, 2007 2:03:49 GMT -5
I mean everyone should enforce it
|
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 16, 2007 3:25:02 GMT -5
But why? Isn't it fitting enough for the criminal to go insane and rot in his jail cell?
|
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 16, 2007 4:02:56 GMT -5
No , because read what I said about if he goes to jail.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 16, 2007 23:34:23 GMT -5
So lock 'em in solitary confinement the entire time. That way no one gets hurt. and the are mentally tortured.
|
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 17, 2007 0:33:00 GMT -5
Wouldn't it mentally totue someone more if you cut off one finger a die, and then leave it there for it to be their only food,
|
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 17, 2007 23:21:27 GMT -5
Thats physical torture/cruel and unusual punishment.
|
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 17, 2007 23:29:29 GMT -5
So, killling 10's of people is much worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 17, 2007 23:46:50 GMT -5
It depends on who you are (its like good and evil) and how they are killed (smothered vs *shot vs *stabbed vs poisoned vs suffocated) and who the person (wants to die vs loves life) is.
*depends on the body part / area of the body
|
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 17, 2007 23:56:45 GMT -5
Ok, lets say quick death but people who have families.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 18, 2007 22:29:07 GMT -5
Not all families are close and loving.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 18, 2007 22:29:27 GMT -5
AND criminals have families too.
|
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 18, 2007 22:38:15 GMT -5
I don't think their families will care if their husband and or wife killed 100's of people.
|
|
The Kimmeth. >_>
Galaxy
planet.gif)
Jason will eat your brains. With milk and cookies. ;3
Posts: 547
|
Post by The Kimmeth. >_> on Sept 19, 2007 13:01:16 GMT -5
Depends on how close the family is with the killer and how their moral compass works.
And yes, cutting off their toes, torturing them, etc. IS cruel and unusual punishment (against the law, it's an Amendment)
Additionally, all criminals who are getting the death sentence should have a quick death. If we have them slowly die, we're just as worse as the killer.
Off-Topic-But-Not-Off-Topic
Can someone be pro-choice and pro-life at the same time?
I'm against the death sentence but I'm for abortion. O.o
|
|
The Kimmeth. >_>
Galaxy
Jason will eat your brains. With milk and cookies. ;3
Posts: 547
|
Post by The Kimmeth. >_> on Sept 19, 2007 13:03:45 GMT -5
Additionally, the topic of board doesn't have to do with your topic message. Well, technically it does, but it's too vague. You should have made it "The Death Penalty Rant" or somethin'.
|
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 19, 2007 18:28:25 GMT -5
1.) It would be a pleasure for a criminal to die a quick death, then to die a slow one in jail or torture, so basically we ar ehelping him.
2.)Thats why its a retarted rule of America.
3.) I don't find abortion is causing death more of stoping life.
|
|
The Kimmeth. >_>
Galaxy
Jason will eat your brains. With milk and cookies. ;3
Posts: 547
|
Post by The Kimmeth. >_> on Sept 19, 2007 20:41:58 GMT -5
1.) What the hell?!?! Who CARES if it's a pleasure for the person, THE CRIMINAL'S GOING TO FUCKIN' DIE! Fucking dumbass. It's already bad enough that they going to put the criminal to mother fucking death!
2.) It's called CRUEL and UNUSUAL punishment for a reason, Nick. There are pleanty of other ways to punish a person besides causing pain/death.
3.) That's not what I asked.
4.) Of course the rockstar should get more sentence than the murderer. The murderer TRIED to kill, while the rockstar DID toture.
5.) Your "I hate the government so much, I'm such an 'anarchist'" bullshit is pissing me off.
6.) If you think America is stupid, move somehwere else. I think America is a splendid country. Sure there are many obese kids in the US and we cause 20% of the pollution in the world, yeah I know it's very very bad, but we get freedom of speech and a lot of other things that other countries couldn't even DREAM of getting. And you might say "But the world hates us! *tear tear*", but that's Bush's fault, not America.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 19, 2007 21:18:08 GMT -5
1)You can be pro-choice and pro-life at the same time ^^
2)All murderers have killed. If you didn't kill you aren't a murderer. If you have tried to kill but failed you are an attempted murderer.
3)And about how the families feel... Most people don't want to believe a loved one is a murderer. So most loving families will be very sad.
4)Jason is right, stop complaining.
|
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 19, 2007 21:48:20 GMT -5
I'm not complaining about how much I hate America anarchist stuff.
My main point is:
I think that torturing a person who kills 100's of innocent people is completely ok.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 19, 2007 22:09:59 GMT -5
Very few people have killed 100s of people, and torture is not OK.
|
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 19, 2007 22:14:42 GMT -5
Why is not ok!
Do you think that torturing a person who set off a nuclear bomb is bad?
|
|
The Kimmeth. >_>
Galaxy
Jason will eat your brains. With milk and cookies. ;3
Posts: 547
|
Post by The Kimmeth. >_> on Sept 20, 2007 18:08:03 GMT -5
-.-'''' Nick. Shut the hell up. It IS bad. Giving them the DEATH sentence is BAD ENOUGH! YOU'RE PUT TO DEATH!!!! YOU DON'T FUCKIN'[/i] LIVE[/i] ANYMORE! Get that through your head! Sheebus Christ! P.S: If you think all criminals should be put to death, I suggest you put a gun to your head right now and blow the trigger. Stealing music is illegal, therefore making you a criminal. And also, before you do that, I suggest you kill almost everybody you know.  |
|
|
|
Post by BananaMuffin on Sept 20, 2007 21:45:20 GMT -5
P.S: If you think all criminals should be put to death, I suggest you put a gun to your head right now and blow the trigger. Stealing music is illegal, therefore making you a criminal. And also, before you do that, I suggest you kill almost everybody you know. i mean mass murderers, like people who set off nuclear bombs. How is it wrong to torture them. I would rather have a quick death then get tortured. I think they deserve to get tortured for killing millions of innocents. |
|
|
|
Post by Marina on Sept 20, 2007 22:17:06 GMT -5
Our former president (during WW2) set off a nuclear bomb and was beloved and good president. Should we have tortured him?
|
|
